SEO & Traffic Intelligence Agency – 3 Months Membership
Salepage : SEO & Traffic Intelligence Agency – 3 Months Membership
Archive : SEO & Traffic Intelligence Agency – 3 Months Membership Digital Download
Delivery : Digital Download Immediately
The SEO & Traffic Intelligence Agency is made up of a small group of SEO & Traffic Professionals that are committed to testing and reporting SEO & Traffic metrics by developing unique tests that allow them to uncover ranking factors.
When you join S.I.A., you will receive monthly access to these research. The SIA also supports the Agent Community on Facebook and Skype and hosts monthly and weekly webinars to go through exams, techniques, and SEO and traffic problems.
Consider us your own SEO and traffic R&D lab; as an Agent in good standing, you may also offer experiments and misconceptions that you’d want to verify, validate, or shatter.
Features
The “silentest” approach to connect inner pages. (This little-known method of website structuring really won our last silo building challenge.)
The “nuclear” connection source we discovered that has been lying in wait for us for years and that no one has used! (It’s amazing what you discover when you start testing. This one is so potent that we considered selling it for $997 on its own.)
Google’s “water-cooler” indexing mechanism that operates on autopilot (I was told this some years ago while playing blackjack with the Google index team at the Hyatt in Lake Tahoe; I tested it, and sure enough, it tested positive, but it’s time to recheck.)
How many links should you send to a site with the same anchor text before over-optimizing for that keyword? (To acquire Google’s updated penalization methodology, we’ll have to wait for the next Penguin update that runs in real time.)
What we know from test results regarding where to put your keywords on the page and if they should be bold, italicized, or ALL CAPS. (And how to apply this understanding to write more efficiently on your website.)
The absolutely backwards (yet 100% true) method of dominating your competition by utilizing Google as your link source. (It’s amazing how few people are aware of this, given how simple, powerful, and effective it is.)
Take the guesswork out of determining how lengthy an article on a page should be; our testing provided us with the answer. (This test has already been completed, and we have the results, and the answers came back relatively straight forward, but see for yourself.) Do the “secrets” of all the current SEO & Traffic experts hold up to scientific testing? (If you have a secret you want us to confirm or blow, simply let us know and we will put it to the test.)
Is it true that inner connecting your PBNs harms them, or does it convey wonderful authority and link juice to each other? (Since 2010, SEO and Traffic have assumed the proper response to this question.) Will we confirm or deny?)
Understand optimization so you can properly respond to your clients’ most pressing question: “How many words should I have on the page?” (It took ten different sites to discover the answer, but it was well worth the effort.)
How to efficiently promote your product pages by inner linking your pages. (In fact, if you do it this way, according to test findings, Google will almost look forward to crawling your page.)
What to do with the links that don’t offer you joy. (The truth regarding Google’s Disavow tool, a test will determine whether it is YAY or NAY)
The “un-sexy” link style, which testing have proven to be the bee’s knees of links, is sometimes disregarded, but it must be included in your anchor formula. (Because it is so underutilized by newcomers, it makes Google’s work easier to identify SEO and traffic.)
If you can’t afford to establish your own PBNs, this is the best approach to build linkages. (Also, the best sites to develop these links from and the ones you should avoid because they never get indexed, as seen by our test findings)
Which strategies “kicked-the-most-ass” when it came to creating “high quality” web 2.0s as tier 1 connections. (Also, which web 2.0 sites should you utilize and which should you avoid like the plague)
Test demonstrates how to employ this unusual and peculiar method to stand out like a sore thumb to Google’ while remaining under the radar and avoiding an over-optimized penalty. (Especially when you’re surrounded by the same old, same old white hat Google kiss butts.)
A “breakthrough finding” that allows even complete newcomers to quickly establish links from a source that will shock your mind. (I didn’t think of it; it’s all Kyle!)
Seeing how many times you can insert your links into a paragraph. (And if different anchor text is required when linking to the same site)
Is “Less is More” the new mantra in the age of link penalties? ( Get the lowdown on what precisely will over-optimize your site, and is there ever a chance to reclaim Google’s trust once you’ve fallen over? Testing will either validate or refute our hypothesis.)
Tests reveal the most useful sites from which to build connections. (As well as the order in which they rank)
Which sites index swiftly (but then slip out of the index despite the fact that the page has not been removed)? Tests give fascinating nuggets of vital knowledge)
Which small domain extension concept has more power than you would believe. (It’s also the first to index!) This resulted from my domain extension test.) Which is better, HTML or Images? (The answer is BOTH, but who will win the Myth Busting competition?)
A spammer approach that allows legitimate white hat SEO and traffics to gain more links from their own Google accounts in an ethical manner. (Although I don’t believe in White Hat, what the heck, let them think it’s OK to establish links without being a Black Hat haha)
Have you heard of the term “Keyword Density?” (How many times should your term appear on the page for optimal value, and when is it too much? It’s time to quit guessing and test it once and for all.) Does CAPITALIZING your keyword in headlines over-optimize your website (or is that simply another myth that has to be debunked?)
Do H tags affect keyword density? (Or if they only count body fat, what is the exact quantity to place, and if there are numerous variations? It’s being tested!)
How to “program” (like Google does) your knowledge to give you nearly infinite ability to reverse engineer the world’s biggest search engine. (And does the fact that you can use every piece of information to create the “ideal website” make you nervous?)
What “precise number” of words on a page passes the test, and how many should you avoid? (You’ve already been under the gun and in your first dispatch.) Do the regulations vary by niche? ( We’ll have to put it to the test, and we’ll see whether we can utilize lorem ipsum in place of “original material” while link building. Is the material around your link important? Oh, it’s SO being tested!)
When is duplicate content acceptable, and is it “truly” so bad? (The phantom “duplicate content” penalty has plagued our sector. Does it actually exist? We’ll be trying this soon, muwahaha) If Google penalizes sites that are excessively or under optimized (and does Google have an ideal optimization rate that we should try to calculate? We’ll find out) What exactly is a “Optimization Rate,” and what is the optimum rate to have while creating a website? (This is distinct from “Keyword Density,” which we also examined.)
The most advantageous amount of times to include your links in a paragraph. (Is “no-follow” still the new “do-follow,” and how much should be used? The results of the tests will be available soon.)
The most important question of all: do Google properties convey “link juice?” (We know they index and can be ranked, but which of the ones we examined PASSED link juice? Is it passed by any of the others? We’ll find out soon enough.)
And much, much more, including…
More from Categories : SEO & Traffic
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.